ArticleScientific reports2025
Selective cognitive effects of multilingualism emerge in visuospatial working memory in later life.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidemiological literature suggests that speaking multiple languages can delay the onset of neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease. Cognitive and neuroscientific explanations, however, remain inconclusive. While some studies have found behavioural and neural effects of being multilingual (compared to monolingual) for working memory, inhibitory control, and attention across the lifespan, others have found no such evidence. An emerging focus on nuanced, dimensional measures of language experience, direct comparison of tasks within the same experiment, and a direct comparison of stimulus modality (visuospatial versus auditory processing) could potentially resolve these mixed findings. The present study investigated whether multilingual experience, measured continuously via the Language History Questionnaire (LHQ-3), was associated with domain-specific cognitive performance in both auditory and visuospatial modalities in a lifespan sample (N = 94, aged 18-83). Participants completed working memory (N-back), inhibitory control (Simon), and attention (Attention Network and Dichotic Listening) tasks in both auditory and visuospatial formats. Generalised additive models revealed no significant associations between multilingual experience and cognitive performance for auditory and most visuospatial tasks. However, a significant interaction between multilingual language diversity and age was found for visuospatial working memory, with older multilingual adults demonstrating higher accuracy and faster response times. These findings suggest that the cognitive effects of multilingualism may be age-, domain-, and modality-specific rather than universal. Neuroprotective associations observed in epidemiological and neuroimaging studies may therefore reflect mechanisms beyond direct behavioural performance, such as neural reserve or compensation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.