Evidence mapPaperPMID 41398216Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

A home and community-based multicomponent physical activity intervention program for Chinese older adults: a development and feasibility study.

Nan Hua, Chengfan Qin, Ange Wang, Yichen Yang, Xinxia Zhang, Qin Zhang, Jing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nan Hua *Department of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chengfan Qin *Department of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Ange WangDepartment of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yichen YangDepartment of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xinxia ZhangDepartment of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qin Zhang *Department of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. zhangqin1978@zju.edu.cn.
Jing Chen *Department of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. Jing.chen@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province 2022C03161the National Natural Science Foundation of China 72304243the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LTGY23H250002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsufficient multicomponent physical activity is prevalent in older adults. In China, a series of supportive policies to promote physical activity (PA) has been implemented. However, feasible PA interventions to promote multicomponent PA among community-dwelling older adults are limited.

objectiveWe aimed to develop a multicomponent PA intervention program for community-dwelling older adults and assess the feasibility.

methodsThe multicomponent PA intervention was developed by a multidisciplinary working group based on Social Cognitive Theory, the Transtheoretical Model, and behavior change techniques. A three-month feasibility study was conducted in a community in Hangzhou, China. Feasibility was tested by Bowen’s framework for assessing the acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, adaptation, integration, expansion, and limited efficacy of the PA intervention program. Demographic and clinical information, group exercise attendance, experience questionnaires, physical measurements, and self-reported exercise records were collected.

resultsThe developed PA intervention combined face-to-face group exercise in a community center and home-based exercise assisted by a WeChat applet or exercise manuals, with a weekly goal of engaging in multicomponent exercise at least three days per week recommended by PA guidelines for older adults. A total of 20 participants were recruited for the feasibility study. Overall, 19 participants (95%) completed the intervention in the feasibility study (average age 77 (SD 9) years), with 12 participants using the WeChat applet and 7 using the exercise manuals for home-based exercises. The intervention satisfied all of Bowen’s feasibility criteria. In the third month, 93% of the WeChat applet group and 79% of the non-WeChat applet group adhered to weekly exercise goals. After three months of intervention, statistically significant improvements were observed in physical activity level (Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly score + 33.6, 95% CI 23.5to 43.6), grip strength (mean difference + 1.4 kg, 95% CI 0.1 to 2.7) and chair stand test (mean difference − 3.5 s, 95% CI -4.9 to -2.2).

conclusionHigh exercise adherence was observed throughout the three-month intervention. The theory-based blended PA intervention program was quite feasible in real-world settings, serving as a novel model for promoting multicomponent PA engagement among community-dwelling older adults in China. A future large-scale randomized controlled trial is needed to test the long-term effectiveness and scalability of the PA intervention program. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyHealth PromotionProgram DevelopmentAgedAged, 80 and overAging in PlaceChinaEast Asian PeopleFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleBlended interventionsCommunity- and home-basedFeasibilityMulticomponent exerciseOlder adultsPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID41398216
PMCPMC12706994

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.