ArticleBMC cancer2025
Senescence-driven molecular subtyping in pancreatic cancer: a multi-omics framework for precision medicine.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a lethal malignancy with a five-year survival rate below 15%, largely due to tumor heterogeneity and limited therapeutic options. While senescence-related genes (SRGs) are implicated in cancer progression, their pancreas-specific roles in PDAC subtyping and treatment remain unexplored.
methodsWe integrated multi-omics data (RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, and whole-genome sequencing) from 402 pancreas-specific SRGs to classify PDAC subtypes through unsupervised clustering. Independent validation cohorts (TCGA-PAAD, n = 183; patient-derived organoids, n = 40) and drug sensitivity screens were used to define subtype-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities. A machine learning-based random forest model identified key SRG biomarkers for clinical stratification.
resultsThree distinct PDAC subtypes were identified: Cluster 1, characterized by extensive immune infiltration; Cluster 2, mixed features with moderate prognosis; and Cluster 3, defined by significant metabolic reprogramming. Drug screens revealed Cluster 3 as uniquely sensitive to Metformin and Trametinib, suggesting combinatory therapy potential. A 20-gene random forest classifier achieved high accuracy in subtype prediction (AUC = 0.96).
conclusionThis study establishes the first pancreas-specific SRG-driven classification of PDAC, resolving prior inconsistencies in Metformin trial outcomes. Our framework enables risk stratification and subtype-guided therapy, with immediate clinical implications: Metabolic-targeting agents (Metformin) may benefit the high-risk Cluster 3, while immunotherapy could be prioritized for Cluster 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.