ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
My risk perception; perspectives from youth at familial risk for bipolar disorder: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOffspring of parents with bipolar disorder (BD) are at increased risk of developing mental health difficulties. While research has documented elevated rates of psychiatric symptoms in this group, less is known about how young people themselves perceive their parent’s illness, their own vulnerability, and the ways in which family relationships shape these experiences. Limited attention has been given to how they understand heredity and how they view preventative support. Greater insight into their lived experiences is essential for designing family-sensitive interventions that address both risks and resources.
methodsThis qualitative study included 15 young people aged 15–24 years who had at least one parent diagnosed with BD. Semi-structured interviews explored experiences of growing up with a parent with BD, perceptions of personal mental health and heredity, and expectations of support and research, which were the four predefined themes. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using qualitative content analysis. In addition, participants completed short self-report measures of mood and family functioning, which were used to provide contextual background for interpreting the qualitative findings.
resultsThe analysis generated several subthemes within each of the four predefined categories. Participants described living with unpredictability, heightened emotional vigilance, and in some cases role reversal, compounded by silence and stigma surrounding the illness. At the same time, they highlighted resources such as emotional awareness, strong sibling bonds, supportive peers, and curiosity about mental health research. Preventative support was welcomed, particularly when tailored to developmental stage and preferences.
conclusionGrowing up with a parent with BD involves both burden and resilience. Young people emphasized secrecy, responsibility, and emotional strain, but also loyalty, adaptability, and motivation to learn. These findings underscore the need for preventive interventions that are age-appropriate and attentive to relational resources, while also addressing vulnerabilities. Including offspring perspectives more systematically in clinical care and research may strengthen prevention for this high-risk yet often overlooked group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.