Observational studyBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Predictive machine learning for postoperative pain using biosignals: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate prediction of postoperative pain can improve recovery quality and guide personalized pain management. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model that predicts the presence of postoperative pain using biosignals recorded in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
methodsAdult patients who underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022 at Chungnam National University Hospital (CNUH) (n = 21,855) and Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital (CNUSH) (n = 2,356) in South Korea were included. Electrocardiography (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) signals were continuously recorded during the postoperative period in the PACU. From these signals, heart rate variability (HRV) and surgical pleth index (SPI) features were extracted. These biosignal features, together with demographic variables, were used as input features for training the ML models, including logistic regression, support vector machine, multilayer perceptron, random forest, and XGBoost. The model was developed and internally validated using the CNUH dataset, while external validation was performed using the independent CNUSH dataset to assess generalizability.
resultsIn the test dataset of 1068 patients, 961 reported postoperative pain. The best-performing model achieved an accuracy of 85.2%, an AUROC of 0.77, and average precision of 0.95, while external validation yielded an accuracy of 83.2% and an AUROC of 0.78. Feature importance analysis using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) indicated that the most influential predictors were the proportion of SPI values exceeding 50, the mean SPI, and the low-to-high frequency power ratio of HRV. Incorporating demographic features, such as age and sex, improved prediction accuracy by up to 5.91%. This improvement may be attributed to the mitigation of inter- and intra-individual variability inherent in biosignals, thereby enhancing the model’s stability and generalizability.
conclusionML models incorporating ECG- and PPG-derived features demonstrated reliable prediction of postoperative pain across independent hospital cohorts, highlighting the potential of biosignal-based approaches for objective pain assessment in clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.