ReviewJournal of forensic sciences2026
Recognizing and mitigating the effects of occupational exposure to traumatic death in forensic anthropology.
Review in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recognizing and mitigating the effects of occupational exposure to traumatic death in forensic anthropology.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic anthropologists regularly come into direct contact with decedents affected by skeletal trauma, and consequently can experience high levels of indirect trauma exposure. However, beyond their nominal inclusion in self-reported surveys of the general forensic science population, there have been few empirical research studies chronicling the outcomes experienced from indirect traumatic stress in forensic anthropologists, including their risk for the development of acute and post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSDs). There have been even fewer educational and training efforts aimed at recognizing and mitigating potential harmful effects. This article utilizes an interdisciplinary approach grounded in clinical psychology and anthropology to examine the risks and potential outcomes associated with exposure to indirect traumatic stress in forensic anthropologists. Vicarious traumatization, compassion fatigue, secondary traumatic stress, and acute and PTSDs are considered in terms of their symptomatology and risks of harm. Forensic anthropology casework involving domestic abuse (including pediatric non-accidental injury), multiple traumatic deaths, fieldwork recoveries, specialized contexts (e.g., mass fatality incidents, human rights investigations), and interaction with family members of decedents are associated with a high risk for potential negative outcomes. Evidence-based recommendations for organizational, peer, and individual mitigation and intervention of risk factors for the development of traumatic stress in these forensic practitioners are provided. Psychoeducation and training as well as empirical study of the potential harmful effects of indirect traumatic stress exposure on forensic anthropologists are strongly encouraged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.