ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Investigating workload and usability of remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical value of robot-assisted catheter navigation for cardiac electrophysiology ablation: current evidence and future directions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- The CathPilot: Usability and Feasibility Evaluation in Simulated-Use Endovascular Interventions.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRobotic systems for catheter ablation have been in clinical use for many years. While their impact on the clinical outcome and procedure times is well studied, aspects like usability and operator workload have received limited attention in the literature. Reduced workload and stress levels benefit the operator's mental and physical health, and can also lower the risk of errors and ultimately improve patient safety. The aim of this study is to investigate the workload and usability of remote magnetic navigation compared to conventional manual navigation.
methodsWe performed a user study with eight electrophysiologists. Each participant performed identical in-vitro navigation tasks replicating those found in pulmonary vein isolation using both manual and magnetic navigation. Magnetic navigation experiments were performed using the Navion, a mobile electromagnetic navigation system.
resultsMagnetic navigation significantly improved usability (p < 0.02) and workload (p < 0.01) compared to manual navigation, measured using the System Usability Scale (magnetic: 85.6 ± 9.3 vs. manual: 75.0 ± 17.8) and NASA Task Load Index (magnetic: 72.4 ± 13.5 vs. manual: 45.8 ± 16.7). Additionally, task completion times were shorter (p < 0.01) with magnetic navigation (284.6 ± 80.7 s) compared to manual navigation (411.0 ± 123.7 s).
conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that remote magnetic navigation using the Navion significantly improves operator experiences in terms of workload and usability, reinforcing the case for wider adoption of well-designed robotic systems in cardiac electrophysiology labs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.