Evidence mapPaperPMID 41398531Full record

ReviewPharmacology research & perspectives2026

Rethinking Statin Dosage in Coronary Disease.

Simon B Dimmitt, Hans G Stampfer, Michael C Kennedy, Jennifer H Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Rethinking Statin Dosage in Coronary Disease.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simon B DimmittDivision of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0093-4949
Hans G StampferJoondalup Health Campus, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7740-751X
Michael C KennedySchool of Clinical Medicine, Medicine and Health, School of Clinical Medicine, St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Jennifer H MartinChair of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-0199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of risk factors and timely revascularisation continues to reduce the morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease. Despite good evidence for reduced mortality on statins and decades of promotion, population uptake globally is less than 3%, and only around 10% even in the United Kingdom and the United States. Statins remain the only cholesterol-lowering drug class shown to improve survival, albeit only in symptomatic coronary patients and on mid-range doses. Population studies have consistently shown that coronary events and mortality are lower the lower the serum total cholesterol concentration. However, below 5 mmol/L (low-density lipoprotein, LDL, cholesterol around 3.5 mmol/L), the population studies show that total mortality begins to rise. Statin research and competitive marketing have advanced to where a wide range of dosages has been approved in many countries. No specific target cholesterol concentration that maximizes survival has been demonstrated in appropriately designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs). As with any enzyme inhibitor, the efficacy of statins plateaus above mid-range doses, but toxicities continue to increase manyfold. In the six largest RCTs that compared high versus mid-range statin doses in coronary patients, a higher statin dose achieved marginally greater reductions in coronary events, in some studies, but without appreciable reduction in mortality. Newer drugs, which reduce PCSK9, and ezetimibe, have similarly not been shown to lower mortality. It is widely acknowledged that a sufficient statin dose is important in the management of symptomatic coronary disease, along with weight reduction and appropriate antithrombotic, blood pressure, and diabetes pharmacotherapy. Mid-range statin doses have been shown to achieve the maximum improvements in total mortality and have the advantage of greater tolerability because of fewer adverse events and interactions.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCholesterolCholesterol, LDLDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCholesterolCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsadverse eventsatheromacholesterolcoronary diseaseeffective dose 50 (ED50)statin

Identifiers

PMID41398531
PMCPMC12705908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.