ReviewPharmacology research & perspectives2026
Rethinking Statin Dosage in Coronary Disease.
Review in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking Statin Dosage in Coronary Disease.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of risk factors and timely revascularisation continues to reduce the morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease. Despite good evidence for reduced mortality on statins and decades of promotion, population uptake globally is less than 3%, and only around 10% even in the United Kingdom and the United States. Statins remain the only cholesterol-lowering drug class shown to improve survival, albeit only in symptomatic coronary patients and on mid-range doses. Population studies have consistently shown that coronary events and mortality are lower the lower the serum total cholesterol concentration. However, below 5 mmol/L (low-density lipoprotein, LDL, cholesterol around 3.5 mmol/L), the population studies show that total mortality begins to rise. Statin research and competitive marketing have advanced to where a wide range of dosages has been approved in many countries. No specific target cholesterol concentration that maximizes survival has been demonstrated in appropriately designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs). As with any enzyme inhibitor, the efficacy of statins plateaus above mid-range doses, but toxicities continue to increase manyfold. In the six largest RCTs that compared high versus mid-range statin doses in coronary patients, a higher statin dose achieved marginally greater reductions in coronary events, in some studies, but without appreciable reduction in mortality. Newer drugs, which reduce PCSK9, and ezetimibe, have similarly not been shown to lower mortality. It is widely acknowledged that a sufficient statin dose is important in the management of symptomatic coronary disease, along with weight reduction and appropriate antithrombotic, blood pressure, and diabetes pharmacotherapy. Mid-range statin doses have been shown to achieve the maximum improvements in total mortality and have the advantage of greater tolerability because of fewer adverse events and interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.