ArticleBMC primary care2025
A mixed-method study on the screening practices and barriers to diabetic microvascular complications by general practitioners in community health centers of Xiamen, China.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly screening and management of diabetic microvascular complications are of crucial importance for preventing diabetes progression and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the current status of screening practices employed by general practitioners (GPs) in community health centers (CHCs) in Xiamen, China, and identify implementation barriers.
methodsA mixed quantitative and qualitative method was adopted between March 2023 and January 2024. The quantitative component involved a cross-sectional study using stratified sampling in nine CHCs from two Xiamen districts. The qualitative component employed semi-structured interviews with participants recruited through purposive sampling. Data analysis used a thematic step-by-step approach.
resultsA total of 93 GPs participated in the quantitative study, with a practice score of 45.9 ± 15.4/100. Higher attitude scores (β = 0.802, P < 0.001) and managing more diabetic patients (β = 0.032, P = 0.008) were associated with better practice scores. A total of 13 GPs participated in qualitative interviews. Current screening practices in CHCs were characterized by inadequate screening items, non-adherence to guideline-recommended screening frequencies, and lack of sustainable screening. Identified barriers included insufficient attention to screening of GPs and patients, knowledge and skill deficits of GPs, human resource shortages, lack of incentive mechanisms, inadequate screening instruments, and low adherence of patients. Strengthening the training of GPs, providing screening instruments, optimizing the screening process, and enhancing patient education are needed for effective improvement.
conclusionThe screening practices for diabetic microvascular complications among GPs in Xiamen were suboptimal, mainly due to factors associated with workforce constraints, variations in GP capabilities, and limitations in available screening instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.