Evidence mapPaperPMID 41398571Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025

Perspectives and Experiences of Adult Patients With Obesity in Dietetic Primary Health Care: A Qualitative Study in the Netherlands.

Annemieke van de Riet, Rebecca S Otte, Lotte Maree-Hulsbergen, Elke Naumann, Marian A E de van der Schueren, Harriët Jager-Wittenaar, Dietetics Building the Future consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Perspectives and Experiences of Adult Patients With Obesity in Dietetic Primary Health Care: A Qualitative Study in the Netherlands.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annemieke van de RietWageningen University and Research, Human Nutrition and Health, Research group Global Nutrition, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-9364
Rebecca S OtteWageningen University and Research, Human Nutrition and Health, Research group Global Nutrition, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-0660
Lotte Maree-HulsbergenWageningen University and Research, Human Nutrition and Health, Research group Global Nutrition, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6747-4629
Elke NaumannHAN University of Applied Sciences, Research Group Nutrition, Dietetics, and Lifestyle, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-3413
Marian A E de van der SchuerenWageningen University and Research, Human Nutrition and Health, Research group Global Nutrition, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5693-0811
Harriët Jager-WittenaarHanze University of Applied Sciences, Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3928-8075
Dietetics Building the Future consortium

Funding

ZonMw 10270032021001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is defined as a chronic, relapsing disease, characterised by its persistence and the frequent recurrence of weight gain following weight loss. It is linked to chronic diseases and reduced quality of life. Sustainable weight loss requires long-term dietary and behavioural changes. Dietetic treatment outcomes vary per patient, leading to differing success rates and effectiveness. Although understanding patient experiences is crucial for designing effective, patient-centered strategies, little is known about their lived experiences. This study aimed to obtain a better understanding of the perspectives and experiences of patients with obesity receiving dietetic treatment in primary health care in the Netherlands.

methodsThis qualitative interpretive study included 26 patients with obesity who were consulting or had consulted a dietitian. We performed purposeful sampling to ensure a sample diverse in socio-cultural background, region, age and health literacy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a predefined topic guide, with room for flexibility to explore emerging topics. We analysed the interview data using reflexive thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke.

resultsFour interconnected themes were constructed from what patients named to be important in dietetic treatment: (1) personalised treatment as a foundation for success, including feeling heard and receiving responsive and adaptive treatment (2) the personal impact of the dietitian on treatment, through the dietitian's attitude, professionalism, and background; (3) a personalised and holistic approach for lasting change, including clarity about the dietitian's ways of working, motivational and emotional support, attention to life context and guidance in developing sustainable habits; and (4) tailored and accessible advice, focusing on practical tools, understandable information, and consistency of advice.

conclusionThis study highlights that successful dietetic treatment for adults with obesity depends on personalised support, a strong patient-dietitian relationship, and holistic attention to psychological and behavioural factors. Clear communication, involvement from the start, and practical, tailored advice help patients comply with treatment and apply recommendations in daily life. Findings emphasise the importance of aligning dietetic treatment with individual patient needs and expectations.

Indexed as

DieteticsObesityPrimary Health CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNutritionistsQualitative ResearchQuality of Lifedietetic treatmentnutritionobesitypatient‐centered carepersonalised treatmentweight management

Identifiers

PMID41398571
PMCPMC12706137

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.