ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025
Remotely Monitored Patients' Experiences of the Interpersonal Patient-Nurse Relationship: A Scoping Review.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Remotely Monitored Patients' Experiences of the Interpersonal Patient-Nurse Relationship: A Scoping Review.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore what has been published in peer-reviewed journals on patients' experiences of the interpersonal relationship between the patient and the nurse when the patient's health data are remotely monitored in an out-of-clinic setting.
introductionInterpersonal relationships are considered a cornerstone in person-centred care and nursing. These relationships can be influenced by context and environment. Remote patient monitoring is increasing within healthcare, with the potential to impact on the relationship between the patient and the nurse. So far, there has been limited knowledge on a general basis of how remotely monitored patients experience this relationship. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Original peer-reviewed studies in English, published year 2014-2024. Patients 18 years and over in an out-of-clinic setting, having their health data collected through remote patient monitoring by nurses exclusively or as part of a multiprofessional team. Patients' experiences/attitudes/perspectives/perceptions of the patient-nurse relationship.
methodsThe research method was based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's method for scoping reviews and the PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews was used when reporting the review. In total, four databases were used in the literature search. Thematic analysis was used for analysing the results.
resultsOut of 9001 articles, 31 studies were included in the review. Thematic analysis resulted in three clusters covering relational aspects and emotional responses of the patient-nurse relationship during remote monitoring. These clusters were Relational aspects of patient-nurse communication and interaction, Emotional aspects of the patient-nurse relationship and Patient participation.
conclusionsRemote patient monitoring is primarily a human-to-human activity. In general, but not solely, patients perceive positive relational experiences with nurses during remote monitoring. Remote patient monitoring can and should be delivered with a person-centred and ethically aware approach. Thus, the acts and efforts of the monitoring nurse play a central role in providing a positive relationship-based experience during remote patient monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.