ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Association of Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir with intubation or mortality risks in severe COVID-19 patients: a comparative study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the association between the use of Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMVr) and the risk of intubation or in-hospital mortality among severe COVID-19 patients using real-world data.
methodsA retrospective cohort from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, ranging from December 15, 2022 to February 15, 2023, was utilized. To control for confounding factors, multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were applied, adjusted using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores.
resultsA total of 1436 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were included. 265 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 169 received the treatment of NMVr and 96 did not. The application of NMVr was significantly associated with a reduced risk of the composite endpoint after adjustment (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.97; P = 0.0374). The results were robust to various sensitivity analyses.
conclusionsThe study suggests that NMVr administration is associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes in severe COVID-19 patients, underscoring the necessity for additional trials to confirm its therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.