ArticleMedicine2025
Management of severe bimaxillary crowding using unilateral molar extraction and miniscrew-assisted posterior distalization: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of temporomandibular joint dysfunction after orthodontic relapse using stabilization splints and clear aligners: a case report.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Dental arch morphology and factors associated with dental crowding: a systematic review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleUnilateral extraction of the compromised maxillary first molar combined with miniscrew-assisted posterior distalization provides a focused, non-surgical approach to correct asymmetrical Class III subdivision and severe bimaxillary crowding while preserving soft-tissue balance. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 26-year-old female with severe bimaxillary crowding, unilateral Class III subdivision, mandibular midline deviation, and a pulp-necrosis maxillary left first molar, seeking a minimally invasive solution without surgery or prosthetic rehabilitation. DIAGNOSES: A unilateral dental Class III subdivision malocclusion, severe mandibular and moderate maxillary crowding, right mandibular midline deviation, a poor-prognosis necrotic maxillary left first molar, mild lip protrusion with a slightly convex profile, and impaction of all third molars.
interventionsThe treatment plan involved the extraction of the maxillary left first molar, followed by space closure using conventional anchorage. This was combined with miniscrew-assisted distalization of the maxillary right and mandibular left posterior segments to retract the maxillary dentition, correct the dental midline discrepancy, and create space for alleviating bimaxillary crowding. Temporary anchorage devices were employed to facilitate controlled tooth movement and to minimize undesirable side effects such as incisor tipping and anchorage loss. OUTCOMES: After 17 months of active treatment, the patient achieved a Class I canine relationship, coincident dental midlines, ideal overjet and overbite, and a notably improved facial profile. The mandibular midline deviation was corrected via unilateral distalization using buccal-shelf miniscrews, while the left posterior maxillary segment was protracted to substitute the extracted molar. From a soft tissue perspective, lip protrusion was reduced, and overall facial balance was enhanced. LESSONS: This case underscores the clinical effectiveness of combining asymmetric molar extraction with skeletal anchorage mechanics as a non-surgical and non-prosthetic treatment alternative for adult patients with asymmetrical Class III malocclusion and compromised molars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.