ArticleMedicine2025
Cross-national comparison of metabolic syndrome prevalence and related medication use in South Korea and the United States, 2007-2020: Evidence from KHANES and NHANES.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship Between the "Life's Essential 8" Lifestyle Metrics and Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels in South Korea.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, yet comparative studies between countries are limited. Thus, we aim to compare trends in MetS prevalence, medication use, and component control in South Korea and the US. We analyzed data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2020 for nonpregnant adults. MetS was defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Use of MetS-related medications was defined as the use of antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and lipid-lowering agents. The weighted prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) of MetS, its components, and their control among individuals on corresponding medications was analyzed, and adjusted odds ratios for component control by sociodemographic factors were estimated using weighted multivariable logistic regression. A total of 74,714 participants aged ≥20 years from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (male, 43.59%) and 14,036 from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (male, 44.12%) were included in the analysis. MetS prevalence was higher in South Korea (18.47% [95% confidence interval, 18.09-18.85]) than in the United States (6.03% [5.54-6.53]). Among the components of MetS, low serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was the most prevalent in South Korea (35.04% [34.57-35.51]), whereas large waist circumference was most common in the United States (48.62% [47.05-50.20]). High prevalence of MetS was associated with older age, obesity, lower income, and nondrinkers in both populations. From 2007 to 2020, antidiabetic use declined in South Korea and increased in the United States, while antihypertensive and lipid-lowering agent use increased in both countries. Among medication users, MetS-related control rates were consistently lower in South Korea compared to the US: fasting glucose (12.76% [10.50-15.03] vs 56.07% [51.15-60.98]), triglycerides (64.39% [63.02-65.77] vs 87.87% [85.90-89.84]), and blood pressure (45.77% [44.72-46.82] vs 55.69% [53.13-58.25]). Significant differences exist in the MetS prevalence, pharmacologic treatment patterns, and control outcomes between South Korea and the US. Targeted strategies tailored to each country-specific context are needed to improve metabolic health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.