Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398790›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

Spontaneous epidermal stimulation briefly and diffusely enhances skin spatial acuity in shooting athletes: Evidence from event-related potentials.

Jingzhe Xiao, Xinge Liu, Chengzhe Ma, Guifang Zhang, Zheng Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingzhe XiaoChina Ice Sport College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Xinge LiuChina Volleyball College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Chengzhe MaChina Ice Sport College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Guifang ZhangQingzhou People's Hospital, Shandong, China.
Zheng XiongChina Ice Sport College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-9087-0354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTactile sensation is crucial because it provides information about objects during fine-motor actions. Skin stimulation has a wide range of effects, including analgesia, cognitive enhancement, and endocrine modulation. However, very few studies have investigated the effects of spontaneous epidermal stimulation (SES) on tactile sensation, and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

methodsTo explore the neural mechanisms of SES-induced enhancement of skin spatial acuity (SSA), we conducted 2 experiments on 40 healthy young shooters, combining the gate-control theory, heart rate variability, and electroencephalography.

resultsOur results indicate that SES transiently and diffusely enhances SSA, with this effect being particularly pronounced under fatigue conditions and occurring within 5 seconds. This enhancement results from multiple parallel neural mechanisms including pain filtering, sensory nerve activation, attentional modulation, and information processing.

conclusionThese findings provide new insights into how SES can be used to enhance tactile sensitivity in athletes, offering potential applications in training and rehabilitation. This could help develop new training and rehabilitation strategies for athletes and patients with tactile impairment.

Indexed as

AthletesEpidermisEvoked PotentialsTouchTouch PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleFirearmsHeart RateHumansMalePhysical StimulationYoung Adult2-point discrimination thresholdevent-related potentialshooting athleteskin spatial acuityspontaneous epidermal stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41398790
PMCPMC12708124

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.