ArticleMedicine2025
Association between social determinants of health and physical disability: Findings from NHANES.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical disabilities are a major determinant affecting the quality of life across populations. The relationship between social determinants of health (SDoH) and physical disabilities is well-established, although research on the specific correlation between these factors remains limited. This paper focuses on analyzing the specific association between the SDoH and physical disabilities in American adults. Information was sourced from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey datasets spanning the years 2013 to 2018. Physical disabilities were evaluated using 6 questions: "Do you have serious hearing difficulties?," "Do you have serious vision impairment?," "Do you experience serious difficulties concentrating?," "Do you experience serious walking difficulties?," "Do you encounter problems with personal care tasks such as dressing or bathing?," and "Do you struggle with independently completing everyday tasks or errands." Responses to these questions were recorded as "Yes" or "No." Individuals were classified as having a physical disability if they answered "Yes" to any of the 6 questions. The SDoH included education, marital status, family income, food security, health insurance, employment status, homeownership, and healthcare accessibility. Controlling for confounding variables, we employed multivariable logistic regression to investigate the connection between SDoH and physical disabilities. A sample of 11,822 participants was used for the final analysis. A significant association was found between unfavorable SDoH and physical disability. For continuous variables, with an increase in the SDoH score, the risk of physical disability was significantly higher (odds ratio = 1.322, 95% confidence interval: 1.259-1.388, P < .0001). When categorized, participants with higher SDoH scores (category: ≥6) were more likely to experience physical disabilities compared with those with lower SDoH scores (category: 0), with an odds ratio of 6.479 (95% confidence interval: 4.643-9.041, P < .0001). Cross-sectional population studies have demonstrated that adverse SDoH are key contributors to physical disability across diverse demographic groups in the United States, encompassing both younger and older individuals. Moreover, the likelihood of physical disability increases markedly with the accumulation of multiple unfavorable SDoH at the individual level, rather than the presence of a single factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.