ArticleMedicine2025
Reevaluating the obesity paradox across diverse disease outcomes: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between handgrip strength and visceral obesity with low appendicular skeletal muscle mass in Chinese adults.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "obesity paradox" suggests a protective effect of obesity on certain diseases including cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses, but results remain inconsistent, largely due to reliance on body mass index (BMI) alone. To clarify this, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess causal effects of multiple obesity-related anthropometric traits on key clinical outcomes. We conducted MR analyses using summary statistics from genome-wide association study to investigate the causal effects of 13 obesity-related anthropometric indicators-including BMI, basal metabolic rate (BMR), hip circumference, waist circumference (WC), body fat percentage (BFP), arm fat mass (AFM), leg fat mass (LFM), trunk fat mass (TFM), trunk fat free mass (TFFM), whole body fat mass, whole body fat free mass (WBFFM), whole body water mass (WBWM), trunk predicted mass (TPM)-on 5 major clinical outcomes: diffuse large B cell lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, pathological fracture in patient with osteoporosis, sepsis, and 28-day mortality due to sepsis. We selected these outcomes because they represent distinct but obesity-relevant disease categories, encompassing cancer, metabolic-skeletal complications, infection, and mortality risk. Sensitivity analyses, included tests for heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy, were performed to assess the stability of MR results. MR analyses revealed no evidence supporting the obesity paradox but demonstrated causal associations between obesity-related traits and clinical outcomes. After excluding traits with horizontal pleiotropy, results showed: BMR, TFFM, and TPM increased diffuse large B cell lymphoma risk; BMI, BMR, AFM, LFM, TFFM, WBFFM, and TPM increased pancreatic cancer risk; BMR, TFFM, WBFFM, WBWM, and TPM increased pathological fracture risk in osteoporosis; BMI, BMR, WC, BFP, AFM, LFM, TFM, whole body fat mass and WBWM increased sepsis risk; and BMI, hip circumference, WC, BFP, AFM, LFM, and TFM increased 28-day sepsis mortality risk (all P < .05). This MR study found no evidence of an "obesity paradox" for the specific outcomes evaluated. Instead, our findings demonstrated that elevated levels of obesity-related anthropometric traits are causally associated with increased risks of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, pathological fractures in osteoporosis, sepsis, and sepsis-related 28-day mortality. These results provide important insights into the pathogenic role of obesity and may inform future strategies for obesity-related disease prevention and risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.