Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398891›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

Reevaluating the obesity paradox across diverse disease outcomes: A Mendelian randomization study.

Penglong Cong, Yixuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Penglong CongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.ORCID 0009-0005-7350-1097
Yixuan LiDepartment of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.ORCID 0009-0001-0860-2191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "obesity paradox" suggests a protective effect of obesity on certain diseases including cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses, but results remain inconsistent, largely due to reliance on body mass index (BMI) alone. To clarify this, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess causal effects of multiple obesity-related anthropometric traits on key clinical outcomes. We conducted MR analyses using summary statistics from genome-wide association study to investigate the causal effects of 13 obesity-related anthropometric indicators-including BMI, basal metabolic rate (BMR), hip circumference, waist circumference (WC), body fat percentage (BFP), arm fat mass (AFM), leg fat mass (LFM), trunk fat mass (TFM), trunk fat free mass (TFFM), whole body fat mass, whole body fat free mass (WBFFM), whole body water mass (WBWM), trunk predicted mass (TPM)-on 5 major clinical outcomes: diffuse large B cell lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, pathological fracture in patient with osteoporosis, sepsis, and 28-day mortality due to sepsis. We selected these outcomes because they represent distinct but obesity-relevant disease categories, encompassing cancer, metabolic-skeletal complications, infection, and mortality risk. Sensitivity analyses, included tests for heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy, were performed to assess the stability of MR results. MR analyses revealed no evidence supporting the obesity paradox but demonstrated causal associations between obesity-related traits and clinical outcomes. After excluding traits with horizontal pleiotropy, results showed: BMR, TFFM, and TPM increased diffuse large B cell lymphoma risk; BMI, BMR, AFM, LFM, TFFM, WBFFM, and TPM increased pancreatic cancer risk; BMR, TFFM, WBFFM, WBWM, and TPM increased pathological fracture risk in osteoporosis; BMI, BMR, WC, BFP, AFM, LFM, TFM, whole body fat mass and WBWM increased sepsis risk; and BMI, hip circumference, WC, BFP, AFM, LFM, and TFM increased 28-day sepsis mortality risk (all P < .05). This MR study found no evidence of an "obesity paradox" for the specific outcomes evaluated. Instead, our findings demonstrated that elevated levels of obesity-related anthropometric traits are causally associated with increased risks of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, pathological fractures in osteoporosis, sepsis, and sepsis-related 28-day mortality. These results provide important insights into the pathogenic role of obesity and may inform future strategies for obesity-related disease prevention and risk assessment.

Indexed as

ObesityBody Mass IndexGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisObesity ParadoxOsteoporosisPancreatic NeoplasmsSepsisanthropometric indicatorscausal inferenceMendelian randomizationobesity-related traits

Identifiers

PMID41398891
PMCPMC12708100

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.