ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Health Funding for Parks and Greenspace: An Innovative Community Investment Strategy.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Climate change and Medicaid: leveraging health policy to support environmental protections for children.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parks and greenspaces provide well-documented benefits for physical, mental, and social health. Nonprofit hospitals, required to conduct Community Health Needs Assessments (CHNAs) and invest in social determinants of health, could therefore advance health and health equity by supporting park access and quality. We reviewed CHNAs from 51 large nonprofit hospitals in U.S. cities ranking in the lower half of the 2024 Trust for Public Land ParkScore Index. We analyzed how parks and greenspaces were addressed in CHNAs and conducted interviews and focus groups with 29 representatives from hospitals, park agencies, and community organizations. Mental health, access to care, and chronic disease were the most frequently identified community priorities in CHNAs. Although 56.9% of CHNAs included data on greenspaces and 54.9% identified parks as a community need, many CHNAs gave limited attention to parks - largely due to limited familiarity, capacity constraints, and competing priorities rather than opposition. Qualitative findings revealed 4 key themes: (1) CHNAs often included community input but lacked resources and coordination to address built environment needs; (2) parks were widely recognized as vital to mental health and social connection but constrained by inequitable access, safety concerns, and underinvestment; (3) existing collaborations between hospitals, parks, and community groups demonstrated promise yet faced capacity barriers; and (4) historical and ongoing structural racism shaped inequities in park access and investment. Our findings reveal an under tapped opportunity for hospitals to integrate parks and greenspaces into CHNAs, strengthen partnerships with park agencies, and direct community benefit investments toward parks to improve community health outcomes. Doing so could help align hospital community benefit spending with upstream drivers of health. We conclude with recommendations for hospitals, park agencies, and community organizations to collaborate in advancing park equity and health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.