ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2025
Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Processing Medical Images.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical Photography for Scientific Publishing (MedPhotoPubl) in Rheumatology and Rehabilitation.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools employ prompts and algorithms to perform tasks that typically require human expertise, hypothesis formulation, and critical evaluation. AI enables rapid analysis of complex imaging data, automates segmentation and lesion detection, and supports real-time image-guided interventions. Deep learning architectures (CNNs, RNNs, U-Net, and transformer-based models) facilitate advanced image classification, reconstruction, and interpretation, achieving clinical accuracies above 90% in multiple domains, including coronavirus disease 2019, oncology, and rheumatology. Generative AI platforms (MedGAN, StyleGAN, CycleGAN, SinGAN-Seg) further support synthetic image creation and dataset augmentation, mitigating data scarcity while preserving patient privacy. However, the integration of AI in healthcare presents significant ethical challenges. Key concerns include algorithmic bias, patient privacy, transparency, accountability, and equitable access. Biases-such as annotation, automation, confirmation, demographic, and feedback-loop bias-can compromise diagnostic reliability and patient outcomes. Ethical deployment requires rigorous data governance, informed consent, anonymization, standardized validation frameworks, human oversight, and regulatory compliance. Maintaining interpretability and transparency of AI outputs is essential for clinical decision-making, while professional training and AI literacy are critical to mitigate overreliance and ensure patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.