Evidence mapPaperPMID 41399310Full record

ArticleJournal of perioperative practice2026

Quality, not just data: Implementing NELA for safer emergency laparotomy care.

Alexander Gaspar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perioperative practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander GasparUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-1209-7452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) is credited with improving outcomes after emergency laparotomy in England and Wales. Yet audit data do not save lives on their own; human effort to implement change does. This article examines how perioperative teams can convert NELA metrics into meaningful improvements, drawing on three implementation studies to separate genuine effect from 'audit spotlight' artefact.Key insights:First: outcome gains depend on implementation fidelity with local adaptation. Where bundle adherence was high and teams had senior champions, effective feedback, and practical enablers, mortality and length of stay improved. Where fidelity to the bundle faltered, benefits disappeared. Second: early wins plateau, so teams should expect diminishing returns and target the remaining vital few barriers (e.g. timely imaging, senior presence, postoperative critical care). Third: equity matters. Smaller hospitals lag on several NELA indicators, suggesting a need for focused support and shared learning. Finally, what matters to patients should be tracked, using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and follow-up where feasible.

conclusionFor perioperative services, the message is practical: NELA data should be paired with near-real-time feedback, pathway steps under clinicians' control need resources, what matters to patients needs to be measured, and local adaptation helps to sustain gains.

Indexed as

LaparotomyMedical AuditPatient SafetyEnglandHumansQuality ImprovementWalesClinical auditClinical governanceEnhanced recovery programmesImplementationLaparotomyLeadershipManagementNon-technical skills or human factors including behaviour and attitudesoutcomesPatient safetyQuality of careService improvement

Identifiers

PMID41399310
PMCPMC13179423

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.