ReviewBritish journal of health psychology2026
Understanding healthy eating and physical activity community-centred behaviour change interventions for underserved populations: A mixed methods rapid review.
Review in British journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding healthy eating and physical activity community-centred behaviour change interventions for underserved populations: A mixed methods rapid review.British journal of health psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCommunity behaviour change interventions are a promising strategy for addressing unhealthy eating and physical activity behaviours in underserved populations. This review explores these interventions' characteristics by focusing on behaviour change techniques, evaluates their behaviour change effectiveness and examines participant experiences.
methodsA mixed-methods rapid review was conducted. Five databases and the grey literature were searched and supplemented by hand searching. Results were screened, assessed for methodological quality and data extracted using the Behaviour Change Techniques Ontology. A convergent segregated approach was used to synthesize the results.
resultsTwenty-one studies were included. Commonly used behaviour change techniques were social support, guidance on how to perform the behaviour and monitoring. Intervention effects on healthy eating and physical activity behaviour change were small, but outcomes that measured influences on behaviour change (e.g., social support) improved. Participants reported largely positive experiences, mostly attributed to the intervention's tailoring to the target population's contexts and the engagement and expertise of those who delivered the intervention.
conclusionsEvidence of direct behaviour change remains limited; there is stronger evidence for improvements in factors that influence behaviour change. Qualitative evidence highlights the value of tailoring interventions to participants' lives and using relatable, knowledgeable sources for delivery. This could enhance engagement and contribute to improved outcomes over time. Further research is needed on how contextual tailoring is implemented and how the characteristics of those delivering interventions influence effectiveness and experience. Findings support the potential of community-centred approaches, but long-term evaluations in underserved contexts are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.