ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2025
Syringe service program leader and participant perspectives on reasons for opioid-stimulant co-use in the United States.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Opioids and stimulants are increasingly used together in North America. Using syringe service program (SSP) leaders' and participants' perspectives, we sought to identify reasons for intentional and unintentional co-use. Methods: We used a sequential exploratory mixed method design with interviews and a questionnaire of SSP leaders and participants in the U.S. between 2022 and 2024. We recruited a national sample of SSP leaders for telephone/virtual interviews, stratifying for counties with higher overdose rates, higher percentages of non-white residents, and geographic variation. We asked SSP leaders to share flyers with their SSP's participants. We analyzed qualitative data using iterative categorization and developed an online quantitative questionnaire based on qualitative findings. We disseminated the questionnaire to all SSP program leaders listed on a public website of SSPs in the U.S. and asked them to share it with their SSPs' participants. We analyzed quantitative data using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results: Individuals (n = 30) from 13 U.S. states completed interviews, indicating the following reasons for co-use: seeking enhanced euphoria, unintentional co-use due to adulteration, staying awake part of the day and sleeping during the other part, using any drug available, perceived health benefits, and balancing effects for a comfortable experience. Individuals (n = 171) from 45 states and Washington, D.C. completed the quantitative questionnaire. Enhanced euphoria was the most frequently perceived reason for co-use (indicated by 67 % of respondents), with no significant differences in reasons for use by region. Discussion: Co-use is often intentional. SSPs should address risks through education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.