ArticleCancer informatics2025
Prediction and Feature Selection of Mastectomy-Related Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Using Machine Learning Among Breast Cancer Patients in Bangladesh.
Article in Cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-mastectomy PTSD is a serious mental health issue, but it has not been studied enough, particularly in low-resource settings like Bangladesh. This study aimed to predict PTSD among breast cancer survivors using machine learning (ML) models and identify significant predictors through the Boruta algorithm, a feature selection tool, offering scalable solutions for early detection and intervention. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 138 post-mastectomy breast cancer patients was conducted across 3 hospitals in Bangladesh. Data on sociodemographic, health history, social experience, and treatment were collected using validated tools, including the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The Boruta algorithm identified key predictors, and 10 ML models were evaluated for PTSD prediction using metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Results: Random Forest (RF) outperformed other models (accuracy: 88.9%, AUC: 0.914). Significant predictors included education, monthly income, and changes in family behaviour. Factors like marital status, having chronic diseases, and hormone therapy were not statistically significant. PTSD prevalence was 34.1%, with urban residents and younger patients facing higher risks. Conclusion: ML models, particularly RF, demonstrated strong predictive performance and identified critical PTSD predictors. These findings highlight the potential for cost-effective PTSD screening in resource-constrained settings. Future research should focus on broader validation and longitudinal studies to refine predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.