ReviewBioactive materials2026
Three-tier framework for high-throughput biofabrication: Integrating 3D bioprinting, assistive platforms, and translational opportunities.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of growth factors in bone tissue engineering delivery systems and collaborative innovation strategies.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Application of 3D-Bioprinting in Treatment of Chronic Wounds: A Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Review 3D-Printed hydrogels for tissue engineering: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Bioinks in systems biology: integrating biomaterial design with cellular network modelling for predictive biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Recent advances in multimodal foundation model-enabled peptide screening and optimization for smart biomaterials and functional tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The field of biofabrication is rapidly evolving, yet it faces persistent challenges, including long manufacturing latency, slow throughput, issues with reproducibility, and scalability limitations. High-throughput biofabrication (HTBF) has emerged as a powerful strategy which is presented here to address these gaps through a structured, three-tier framework. Tier 1 encompasses core HTBF methods, such as multi-modal bioprinting and robotic bioassembly, which enable the rapid fabrication of large, physiologically relevant tissue constructs. Tier 2 comprises assisting platforms, including microfluidics and microphysiological bioreactors, which provide perfusion, mechanical conditioning, multiplexable sensing, and process parallelization. Tier 3 represents HTBF outcomes, including organoids, organ-on-a-chip systems, and engineered tissue grafts that deliver clinically and pharmacologically relevant insights. These advancements enable the development of in-vitro models that streamline drug testing, making it more cost-effective and efficient, while enhancing the accuracy and reliability of preclinical drug evaluation. This review defines HTBF by outlining its core characteristics and framework, presenting insights into recent technological advancements and their applications in regenerative medicine and drug discovery. Additionally, it addresses the regulatory and clinical translation challenges that must be resolved to facilitate the adoption of HTBF in personalized healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.