Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41399464›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2026

Three-tier framework for high-throughput biofabrication: Integrating 3D bioprinting, assistive platforms, and translational opportunities.

Yogendra Pratap Singh, Joseph Christakiran Moses, Myoung Hwan Kim, Deepak Gupta, Vaibhav Pal, Irem Derman Deniz, Ethan Michael Gerhard, Ibrahim T Ozbolat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review 3D-Printed hydrogels for tissue engineering: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yogendra Pratap SinghDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Joseph Christakiran MosesDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Myoung Hwan KimThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Deepak GuptaDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Vaibhav PalThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Irem Derman DenizDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Ethan Michael GerhardDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Ibrahim T OzbolatDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Funding

Technology Development Project - Increasing the complexity of ex vivo human airway models for studying immune response to viral infectionU19AI142733 · NIAID · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Damien Chaussabel · 2019 to 2026
$23.1M
Intraoperative bioprinting of composite tissues with zonal stratification for craniomaxillofacial reconstructionR01DE028614 · NIDCR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI OZBOLAT, IBRAHIM · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
High-throughput Spheroid Bioprinting Technology for Scalable Fabrication of TissuesR01EB034566 · NIBIB · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Ibrahim Ozbolat · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
3D Printing of Air: An Intangible Ink for Fabrication of Vascularized TissuesR01EB036245 · NIBIB · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Ibrahim Ozbolat, DINO J RAVNIC · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
Developing in situ transcriptomics of a bioprinted follicular skin modelR21AR082668 · NIAMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI OH, JULIA, OZBOLAT, IBRAHIM · 2023 to 2023
$439k
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI142733NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR082668NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB034566NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB036245NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of biofabrication is rapidly evolving, yet it faces persistent challenges, including long manufacturing latency, slow throughput, issues with reproducibility, and scalability limitations. High-throughput biofabrication (HTBF) has emerged as a powerful strategy which is presented here to address these gaps through a structured, three-tier framework. Tier 1 encompasses core HTBF methods, such as multi-modal bioprinting and robotic bioassembly, which enable the rapid fabrication of large, physiologically relevant tissue constructs. Tier 2 comprises assisting platforms, including microfluidics and microphysiological bioreactors, which provide perfusion, mechanical conditioning, multiplexable sensing, and process parallelization. Tier 3 represents HTBF outcomes, including organoids, organ-on-a-chip systems, and engineered tissue grafts that deliver clinically and pharmacologically relevant insights. These advancements enable the development of in-vitro models that streamline drug testing, making it more cost-effective and efficient, while enhancing the accuracy and reliability of preclinical drug evaluation. This review defines HTBF by outlining its core characteristics and framework, presenting insights into recent technological advancements and their applications in regenerative medicine and drug discovery. Additionally, it addresses the regulatory and clinical translation challenges that must be resolved to facilitate the adoption of HTBF in personalized healthcare.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingAutomationBiomaterialsBioreactorsDrug screeningMicrofluidicsTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41399464
PMCPMC12702195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.