Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41399483›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials and biosystems2025

Advancing 3D scaffold models for metastatic prostate cancer in bone: Materials, manufacture, and future perspectives.

Annachiara Dozzo, Aikaterini Dedeloudi, Dimitrios Lamprou, Caitriona M O'Driscoll, Katie B Ryan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials and biosystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annachiara DozzoSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland.
Aikaterini DedeloudiSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, BT9 7BL Belfast, UK.
Dimitrios LamprouSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, BT9 7BL Belfast, UK.
Caitriona M O'DriscollSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland.
Katie B RyanSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The metastatic spread of prostate cancer to the bone is debilitating for patients and is associated with a poor prognostic outlook. Gaining a deeper insight into the pathophysiology of prostate cancer and its metastatic spread using advanced, in vitro, 3D models could enhance disease understanding and the successful development of new drug treatments. The in vitro replication of prostate cancer metastasisation to bone is challenging and has received little research attention. The 3D scaffold models investigated to date exhibit different physical characteristics and utilise a diverse range of materials, and manufacturing methods. This variability is likely driven by the lack of standardisation and guidance. Herein, we review the scaffold models used as in vitro bone niches of prostate cancer metastases and examine the different physical (e.g. porosity, pore geometry) and material criteria that guide the design and production of artificial 3D bone aliases. We critically review different manufacturing techniques ranging from standard techniques (e.g. freeze drying) to more advanced additive manufacturing strategies that enable the production of more intricate and controlled structures. Ultimately, we provide insights and future directions to guide researchers investigating this poorly studied field.

Indexed as

3D cancer models3D printingBone metastasesDrug screening toolsMetastatic prostate cancer (mPC)Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID41399483
PMCPMC12702246

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.