ReviewBiomaterials and biosystems2025
Advancing 3D scaffold models for metastatic prostate cancer in bone: Materials, manufacture, and future perspectives.
Review in Biomaterials and biosystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The metastatic spread of prostate cancer to the bone is debilitating for patients and is associated with a poor prognostic outlook. Gaining a deeper insight into the pathophysiology of prostate cancer and its metastatic spread using advanced, in vitro, 3D models could enhance disease understanding and the successful development of new drug treatments. The in vitro replication of prostate cancer metastasisation to bone is challenging and has received little research attention. The 3D scaffold models investigated to date exhibit different physical characteristics and utilise a diverse range of materials, and manufacturing methods. This variability is likely driven by the lack of standardisation and guidance. Herein, we review the scaffold models used as in vitro bone niches of prostate cancer metastases and examine the different physical (e.g. porosity, pore geometry) and material criteria that guide the design and production of artificial 3D bone aliases. We critically review different manufacturing techniques ranging from standard techniques (e.g. freeze drying) to more advanced additive manufacturing strategies that enable the production of more intricate and controlled structures. Ultimately, we provide insights and future directions to guide researchers investigating this poorly studied field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.