ReviewRegenerative therapy2026
Smart integrated biomaterial systems for precision and optimized delivery of MSCs and their exosomes: Transforming wound healing and organ regeneration.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rational design of immunological programs for functional regenerative niches.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Hydrogel-extracellular vesicle engineering delivery system: a promising therapeutic strategy for wound healing.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Transforming PRP into a shelf-stable therapy: Lyophilization preserves angiogenic and regenerative properties.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond immunomodulation: mechanisms and synergistic strategies of mesenchymal stem cells in promoting alveolar epithelial and endothelial repair in ARDS.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Evolving Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Exosomes in Epilepsy Management: From Bench to Bedside.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- miRNAs-neutrophil axis: novel insights into acute lung injury and chronic inflammatory lung diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their exosome (MSCs-Exos) have been shown to be major therapeutic candidates in regenerative medicine due to their inherent capacity for modulating immune response, promoting angiogenesis, and repairing tissues. However, clinical application of MSCs and MSCs-Exos is hindered by various intrinsic barriers, such as poor survival of transplanted MSCs, quick systemic clearance of exosomes, uncontrolled release of therapeutic payloads, and loss of function in severe pathological situations, such as chronic wounds and fibrotic tissues. To overcome these limitations, recent advances have focused on the design of modern delivery systems to enhance the stability, bioavailability, and functionality of MSCs and MSCs-Exos. These platforms include responsive hydrogels, engineered nanoparticles, and multi responsive intelligent dressings that mirror protective microenvironments in general and provide controlled, long-term distribution of bioactive elements. This current review focuses on such innovative approaches that enhance regeneration results in strong preclinical models, maximize therapeutic delivery, and boost MSCs and exosome survival. Despite remarkable advancements, major obstacles still exist, such as guaranteeing biosafety, achieving scale production, and obtaining regulatory approvals. The combination of MSCs and MSCs-Exos therapies with intelligent, responsive biomaterials capable of providing antimicrobial function and active monitoring has the potential to revolutionize tissue regeneration and wound healing and make MSCs and MSCs-Exos invaluable resources in precision regenerative medicine of the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.