Evidence mapPaperPMID 41399764Full record

ReviewRegenerative therapy2026

Smart integrated biomaterial systems for precision and optimized delivery of MSCs and their exosomes: Transforming wound healing and organ regeneration.

Fatemeh Rafati, Zeynab Ghorbani, Tahereh Manoochehrabadi, Farbod Khosravi, Jila Majidi, Fatemeh Eskandari, Mohamad Eftekhary, Hajar Nasiri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fatemeh RafatiDepartment of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran.
Zeynab GhorbaniMedical Biotechnology Research Center, School of Paramedicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Tahereh ManoochehrabadiTissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Farbod KhosraviSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jila MajidiDepartment of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh EskandariDepartment of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohamad EftekharyMedical Biotechnology Research Center, School of Paramedicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Hajar NasiriMedical Biotechnology Research Center, School of Paramedicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their exosome (MSCs-Exos) have been shown to be major therapeutic candidates in regenerative medicine due to their inherent capacity for modulating immune response, promoting angiogenesis, and repairing tissues. However, clinical application of MSCs and MSCs-Exos is hindered by various intrinsic barriers, such as poor survival of transplanted MSCs, quick systemic clearance of exosomes, uncontrolled release of therapeutic payloads, and loss of function in severe pathological situations, such as chronic wounds and fibrotic tissues. To overcome these limitations, recent advances have focused on the design of modern delivery systems to enhance the stability, bioavailability, and functionality of MSCs and MSCs-Exos. These platforms include responsive hydrogels, engineered nanoparticles, and multi responsive intelligent dressings that mirror protective microenvironments in general and provide controlled, long-term distribution of bioactive elements. This current review focuses on such innovative approaches that enhance regeneration results in strong preclinical models, maximize therapeutic delivery, and boost MSCs and exosome survival. Despite remarkable advancements, major obstacles still exist, such as guaranteeing biosafety, achieving scale production, and obtaining regulatory approvals. The combination of MSCs and MSCs-Exos therapies with intelligent, responsive biomaterials capable of providing antimicrobial function and active monitoring has the potential to revolutionize tissue regeneration and wound healing and make MSCs and MSCs-Exos invaluable resources in precision regenerative medicine of the future.

Indexed as

BiomaterialExosomesHydrogelsMesenchymal stem cellsNanoparticleSmart wound dressings

Identifiers

PMID41399764
PMCPMC12702032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.