Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41399939›Full record

SynthesisBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026

Mapping molluscan endocrinology: a systematic and critical appraisal.

Konstantinos Panagiotidis, Thomas H Miller, Olwenn V Martin, Alice Baynes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantinos PanagiotidisEnvironmental Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University of London, Kingston Ln, London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-7504-5435
Thomas H MillerEnvironmental Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University of London, Kingston Ln, London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Olwenn V MartinDepartment of Arts and Science, Faculty of Arts & Humanities, University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2724-7882
Alice BaynesEnvironmental Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University of London, Kingston Ln, London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council 2390134Natural Environment Research Council NE/S007229/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, a vertebrate-centric paradigm has framed our interpretation of molluscan endocrinology, with considerable research focusing on vertebrate-type steroid hormones (e.g. oestrogens, testosterone). However, contradictory evidence on the occurrence of vertebrate-type steroid hormones in molluscan tissues, and a lack of the specific steroidogenesis enzymes involved in producing these steroids has fuelled an ongoing debate about the ability of molluscs to biosynthesise vertebrate-type steroids de novo. Consequently, the exploration of other hormonal pathways that may exist in the phylum remains a significant knowledge gap. This study systematically identified, combined and evaluated evidence from 147 eligible studies (published between 2012 and 2021) on the occurrence of hormones, hormone receptors and hormone-metabolising enzymes in Mollusca according to the 2015 PRISMA-P systematic review guidelines and the 2020 COSTER guidelines. The data collected are holistically summarised and visualised in a fully searchable, interactive and openly accessible online database using Tableau Public 2023.1 software. A critical appraisal assessment (Risk-of-Bias tool) accompanied by tailor-made guidelines as well as a narrative synthesis using comparative endocrinology is presented. Strikingly, 95% of studies measuring hormones in molluscs did not investigate the hormones' ability to bind to their respective receptors. Moreover, many studies either used methods now considered unreliable (e.g. lack specificity) to identify relevant biomolecules (i.e. hormones, receptors, enzymes) or did not employ robust internal validation steps, with 83% of all studies not independently repeating their experiments. This highlights an urgent need for greater experimental rigour in the field. Most studies were also found to be heavily skewed towards vertebrate-type sex steroidogenesis, with 66% measuring 17β-oestradiol in mollusc tissues, despite unconvincing evidence that molluscs can biosynthesise vertebrate-type steroids. By contrast, the retinoic acid signalling pathway, known to be more evolutionarily conserved (and a target of environmental pollution), has received far less attention. However, a limited number of studies are now looking beyond vertebrate-type sex steroids, notably those looking at thyroid hormones, phytosterols (plant sterols) and ecdysteroids (insect steroids) in molluscs. These studies should act as a catalyst to spark interest in further exploration of understudied or unexplored hormonal pathways in Mollusca to elucidate fully the endocrinology of this important phylum.

Indexed as

HormonesMolluscaAnimalsHormonescholesterolecdysteroidendocrinologyhormonemolluscphytosterolretinoidsteroidsteroidogenesissterolthyroid

Identifiers

PMID41399939
PMCPMC12965858

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.