ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict moderate-to-severe cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A machine learning model to predict cancer-related fatigue: clinical discrimination using likelihood ratios.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to establish and validate a machine learning model for predicting moderate-to-severe cancer-related fatigue (CRF) 2 years after completion of anti-tumor therapy in breast cancer patients.
methodsClinical and laboratory data from 183 patients were retrospectively collected. Candidate predictors were screened using multivariate logistic regression, and seven algorithms-logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbor, and naïve Bayes-were constructed in the training cohort and validated in the testing cohort. Model performance was assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis.
resultsThe 2-year incidence of moderate-to-severe CRF was 54.0%. Eight independent predictors were identified, including age, body mass index, histological grade, menopausal status, hemoglobin, platelet count, neutrophil count, and systemic immune-inflammation index. Models built on these features demonstrated variable performance, with XGBoost showing the most favorable balance. It achieved an AUC of 0.983 in the training set and 0.766 in the validation set, with robust accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Calibration plots indicated good agreement between predicted and observed risks, while decision curve analysis confirmed higher net clinical benefit across a wide range of thresholds.
conclusionThe XGBoost-based model provided reliable long-term CRF risk prediction, supporting early identification of high-risk patients and informing personalized survivorship care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41400875What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.