In one paragraphArticle in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
11 authors.
Alessandro PopoliDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-4649-6664 Remco A MentinkDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1005-7767 Lisa BrombachDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-9334-7828 Nora Papadima-KaranikouDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.
Manuel Buendia-MonrealDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0071-6899 Mingming FangDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1807-8802 Manas JoshiDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9486-0324 Saiko YoshidaDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6111-9353 Stefan LaurentDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.
Peter HuijserDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.
Miltos TsiantisDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7150-1855 Funding
European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) ALTF-502-2015Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG) N/A
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, PlantHomeodomain ProteinsPlant LeavesTranscription FactorsArabidopsis ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription Factorsenhancerevo devogene duplicationhomeobox geneleaf shape
Identifiers
PMID41401003
PMCPMC12745806
What Socratic holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390