Evidence mapPaperPMID 41401064Full record

ReviewRadiology and oncology2025

Breaking the pain barrier: implantable intrathecal pump therapy as a game-changer in cancer pain management.

Iztok Potocnik, Branka Strazisar, Helena Lenasi, Teodora Zupanc

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiology and oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07499882 (Observational and Data Collection Study About Intrathecal Ziconotide in the Treatment of Chemotherapy Induced Neuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07499882 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Observational and Data Collection Study About Intrathecal Ziconotide in the Treatment of Chemotherapy Induced Neuropathy

TypeobservationalSponsorChristian Hospital Northeast NorthwestRan2026 to 2028Enrolled24ConditionsChemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)ArmsZiconotide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iztok Potocnik1Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Branka Strazisar1Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Helena Lenasi3Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Teodora Zupanc1Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic cancer pain, especially in advanced stages, remains a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating complex multimodal strategies. Although systemic opioids are standard therapy, many patients experience inadequate relief or adverse effects. Implantable intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) have emerged as a promising alternative, enabling targeted analgesia with reduced opioid burden and improved quality of life. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on the clinical application, efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of IDDS in cancer pain management. Literature sources include clinical trials, observational studies, health-economic evaluations, and international guidelines published between 2002 and 2023. A Slovenian case report is included, detailing the first national experience with IDDS implantation for refractory cancer pain. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (r-ESAS).

conclusionsFindings from the literature confirm that intrathecal pumps provide substantial and sustained pain relief, often with a significant reduction in systemic opioid doses and associated side effects. Compared to conventional pharmacotherapy, intrathecal delivery is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes, fewer hospitalizations, and lower long-term healthcare costs. In the Slovenian case, VAS scores decreased from > 8 to 3 shortly after implantation, with parallel improvements in quality-of-life indices. IDDS represent a clinically effective and economically sustainable option for selected patients with complex cancer pain, particularly when systemic therapy proves insufficient. Their integration into multidisciplinary palliative care pathways supports personalized, safe, and compassionate treatment approaches. By combining an evidence-based overview with real-world national experience, this review underscores the therapeutic value of intrathecal drug delivery and calls for broader clinical awareness and future research.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCancer PainInfusion Pumps, ImplantablePain ManagementCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInjections, SpinalPain MeasurementQuality of LifeAnalgesics, Opioidcancer painimplantable pumpsintrathecal drug deliveryopioid-sparing therapypalliative care

Identifiers

PMID41401064
PMCPMC12707450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.