Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41401182›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

The Drosophila escape motor circuit shows differential vulnerability to aging linked to functional decay.

Alexandros Gaitanidis, Veronica Pampanin, Jessica Thiem, Georgios Kalaras, Lion Huthmacher, Silvan Hürkey, Dimitrios Kadas, Agapi Dimitriadou, Andriana Ntogka, Subhabrata Sanyal and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexandros GaitanidisLaboratory of Experimental Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece.
Veronica PampaninInstitute of Developmental Biologie and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jessica ThiemInstitute of Developmental Biologie and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Georgios KalarasLaboratory of Experimental Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece.
Lion HuthmacherInstitute of Developmental Biologie and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Silvan HürkeyInstitute of Developmental Biologie and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Dimitrios KadasLaboratory of Experimental Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece.
Agapi DimitriadouLaboratory of Experimental Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece.
Andriana NtogkaLaboratory of Experimental Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece.
Subhabrata SanyalDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Calico Life Sciences LLC, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Christos ConsoulasLaboratory of Experimental Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7004-0062
Carsten DuchInstitute of Developmental Biologie and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6962-6023

Funding

EU-European Social FundGerman Research Foundation (DFG)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain aging can cause cognitive and motor disabilities which often correlate with changes in dendritic branch, axon collateral, and synapse numbers. However, from invertebrates to mammals, age-related decline is typically restricted to specific neuron types or brain parts, indicating differential vulnerability. The rules to pinpoint the susceptibility of distinct brain elements to aging remain largely unknown. Here, we combine longitudinal studies with neuroanatomical, electrophysiological, and optophysiological analyses in the Drosophila genetic model to identify aging-susceptible and aging-resilient elements in a sensorimotor circuit that underlies escape. Young and mid-aged flies escape predator-like visual stimuli with a jump followed by flight, but behavioral performance declines with age. Mapping the underlying functional decline into the brain shows that most circuit components are robust against aging and remain functional even in old flies that have lost the behavior. By contrast, behavioral decline is caused by the selective decay of synaptic transmission between one specific visual projection neuron type (LC4) and the dendrite of one identified descending neuron (GF). Structurally, presynaptic active zone marker density is reduced whereas postsynaptic marker density remains normal. Other central synapses in this circuit as well as neuromuscular synapses are robust to aging. The synaptic connection susceptible to aging is also the circuit element most vulnerable to starvation or oxidative stress. Moreover, the vulnerable circuit element is also required for habituation, and thus, underlying circuit plasticity. In conjunction with data from mammalian brains our data suggest that a trade-off for functional neural circuit plasticity might be vulnerability to aging.

Indexed as

AgingDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterEscape ReactionAnimalsBrainDendritesMotor NeuronsSynapsesSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID41401182
PMCPMC12707685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.