Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41401187›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The dilemma of sweet temptation: How sugar perception confusion in sweetened beverages shapes consumer avoidance behavior.

Qingxia Li, Xin Yang, Xin Bai, Ying Zhang, Qiang Li, Yingji Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qingxia LiSchool of Government Management, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, China.
Xin YangGraduate School, Stamford International University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Xin BaiGraduate School, Stamford International University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Public Education, Shandong Vocational College of Special Education, Jinan, China.
Qiang LiSchool of Economics and Management, Shanghai Technical Institute of Electronics & Information, Shanghai, China.
Yingji LiSchool of Humanities and Management, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6420-5391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite widespread consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, consumers face contradictory information from health authorities, marketing, and social media, yet limited research examines how this information conflict affects purchasing decisions. This study investigates how sugar perception confusion influences purchasing avoidance through ambivalent attitudes. Based on cognitive dissonance and information processing theories, we developed a cognitive-affective-behavioral model examining relationships among sugar perception confusion, ambivalent attitudes, and purchasing avoidance behaviors. Using PLS-SEM analysis of 531 Chinese consumers, results show sugar perception confusion significantly affects ambivalent attitudes (β = 0.576, p < 0.001), which strongly predict purchasing avoidance (β = 0.593, p < 0.001). Sugar perception confusion also directly influences purchasing avoidance (β = 0.155, p < 0.001), with ambivalent attitudes serving as a significant mediator (indirect effect β = 0.342, p < 0.001). These findings advance consumer information processing theory and provide evidence-based insights for optimizing information environments to support informed decision-making.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorSugar-Sweetened BeveragesAdolescentAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41401187
PMCPMC12707646

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.