ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
The loss of a supergene in obligately polygynous Formica wood ant species.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ancient but dynamic: structural expansion, massive gene duplication, and transposable element colonization in a supergene controlling ant social organization.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Multiple Origins of a Sex Ratio Supergene in Formica Ants.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Introgression and Divergence in a Young Species Group.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Genomic incompatibilities are persistent barriers when speciation happens with gene flow in Formica ants.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A Novel Supergene Controls Queen Size and Colony Social Organization in the Ant Myrmica ruginodis.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Unexpected absence of a multiple-queen supergene haplotype from supercolonial populations of Formica ants.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Some of the most striking examples of phenotypic variation within species are controlled by supergenes. However, most research on supergenes has focused on their emergence and long-term maintenance, leaving the later stages of their life cycle largely unexplored. Specifically, what happens to a derived supergene haplotype when the trait it controls reaches fixation? Here we answer this question using the ancient supergene system of Formica ants, where (monogynous) single-queen colonies typically carry only the ancestral haplotype M while the derived haplotype P is exclusive to (polygynous) colonies with multiple queens. Through comparative population genomics of 264 individuals from all seven European wood ant species, we found that the P haplotype was present in only 1/3 obligately polygynous species (Formica polyctena). In the two others (Formica aquilonia and Formica paralugubris), the P haplotype was completely missing except for duplicated P-specific paralogs of two genes, Zasp52 and TTLL2, with Zasp52 being directly involved in wing muscle development. We hypothesize that these genes play a direct role in polygyny and contribute to differences in body size and/or dispersal behavior between monogynous and polygynous queens. A complete lack of P/P genotypes among the 261 workers suggests strong selection against such genotypes. While our analyses did not reveal evidence of increased mutation load on the P, it is possible that this skew in genotype distributions is driven by a few loci with strong fitness effects. We propose that selection to escape P-associated fitness costs underlies the loss of this haplotype in obligately polygynous wood ants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.