Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402539›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2025

Catalyzing change in MID3 through globalization, education, and innovation.

Douglas W Chung, Sihem Ait-Oudhia

Erratum issuedAbstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Douglas W ChungCertara Inc, Radnor, PA, USA. doug.chung@certara.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4243-234X
Sihem Ait-OudhiaQuantitative Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics (QP2), Merck & Co., Inc, NJ, Rahway, USA. sb.manuscript.submission@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9794-8601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The landscape of pharmaceutical research and drug development is undergoing a significant evolution, with Model-Informed Drug Discovery and Development (MID3) as a transformative approach to accelerate innovation. Realizing the full potential of MID3 required a concerted global effort to enhance education, foster collaboration, and drive scientific advancement. In this issue, we propose that true progress and equitable outcomes hinge on embracing a multifaceted approach, encompassing not only the inclusion of data from diverse patient populations, such as pediatric and pregnant individuals, but also fostering an inclusive environment for a globally diverse group of scientists. We highlight the critical role of globalization in expanding pharmacometrics collaborations across national boundaries and cultural contexts, recognizing that varied perspectives and expertise drive richer insights. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of equitable access to education and training, particularly for non-native English-speaking institutions, in cultivating a truly global talent pool. Finally, we demonstrate how this expanded diversity fuels innovation, encouraging the adoption of a broader spectrum of quantitative approaches-from classical PK/PD to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics (PBPK), Quantitative Systems Pharmacology and Toxicology (QSP/T), and artificial intelligence driven modeling, thereby addressing complex biological challenges and ultimately achieving the "right dose for the right patient at the right time." This editorial emphasizes that by intentionally integrating globalization, education, and innovation, the pharmacometrics community can catalyze profound change in MID3, leading to more effective and inclusive medicines for all.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryInternationalityPharmaceutical ResearchHumansModels, BiologicalCollaborationEducationGlobalizationInnovationMID3

Identifiers

PMID41402539

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.