Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402634›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Plasmid2MC: efficient cell-free generation of high-purity minicircle DNA for genome editing in mammalian cells.

Roman Teo Oliynyk, Ahmed Mahas, Emil Karpinski, George M Church

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultra-large targeted DNA integrations in primary human cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roman Teo OliynykDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. roli573@aucklanduni.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1893-199X
Ahmed MahasDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Emil KarpinskiDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9463-2636
George M ChurchDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6232-9969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA plasmids are widely used for delivering proteins and RNA in genome editing. However, their bacterial components can lead to inactivation, cell toxicity, and reduced efficiency compared to minicircle DNA (mcDNA), which lacks such bacterial sequences. Existing commercial kits that recombine plasmids into mcDNA within proprietary bacterial strains are labor-intensive, yield inconsistent results, and often produce endotoxin-contaminated low-quality mcDNA. To address this challenge, we developed Plasmid2MC, a novel cell-free method utilizing ΦC31 integrase-mediated recombination to efficiently excise the bacterial backbone from conventionally prepared plasmids, followed by digestion of the bacterial backbone and all other DNA contaminants, resulting in highly pure and virtually endotoxin-free mcDNA. We demonstrated the application of mcDNA to express CRISPR-dCas9 for base editing in HEK293T cells and mouse embryonic stem cells, as well as for homology-independent targeted insertion (HITI) genome editing. The method's ease of preparation, high efficiency, and the high purity of the resulting mcDNA make Plasmid2MC a valuable tool for applications requiring bacterial backbone-free circular DNA.

Indexed as

DNA, CircularGene EditingPlasmidsAnimalsCell-Free SystemCRISPR-Cas SystemsHEK293 CellsHumansMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsDNA, Circular

Identifiers

PMID41402634
PMCPMC12708848

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.