ArticleCardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports2025
Serum PCSK9 is not independently associated with dyslipidaemia in type 2 diabetes: a paired cross-sectional study.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDyslipidaemia is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and contributes substantially to cardiovascular risk. Circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) regulates LDL receptor turnover, yet its relationship to the lipid phenotype in T2DM remains uncertain.
objectiveTo compare lipid fractions and PCSK9 concentrations between matched individuals with and without T2DM and to determine whether PCSK9 is independently associated with dyslipidaemia.
methodsA total of 100 age- and sex-matched pairs were enrolled. After excluding pairs with incomplete or compromised lipid or PCSK9 measurements, 92 pairs were retained for the primary analysis. Missingness was primarily due to inadequate sample volume and hemolyzed specimens. Fasting total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, LDL-C, and triglycerides (TG) were measured in mmol/L, and serum PCSK9 was quantified in native assay units. Primary analyses used within-pair differences (paired t and Wilcoxon tests) and linear mixed-effects models (outcome ~ group + (1|pair_id)). Logistic regression evaluated associations of PCSK9 and diabetes status with dyslipidaemia, defined as LDL-C ≥ 3.37 mmol/L, HDL-C < 1.03 mmol/L, or TG ≥ 1.70 mmol/L. Multiple testing was controlled by the Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate and Bonferroni correction.
resultsCompared with controls, participants with T2DM had significantly higher lipid fractions but similar PCSK9 concentrations. Mean paired differences (T2DM - Control [95% CI]) were: TC + 0.91 mmol/L (0.46 to 1.37), HDL-C + 1.11 mmol/L (0.90 to 1.32), LDL-C + 2.12 mmol/L (1.78 to 2.46), and TG + 0.59 mmol/L (0.50 to 0.68) (all p < 0.001); PCSK9 - 0.58 (-1.57 to 0.41, p = 0.25). In mixed-effects models, group effects remained significant for all lipid fractions but not for PCSK9. In logistic regression, PCSK9 was not associated with dyslipidaemia (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91-1.08, p = 0.81; AUC 0.51).
conclusionsAmong matched adults with and without T2DM, serum PCSK9 showed no independent association with dyslipidaemia despite significant elevations in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG in the diabetic group. Interpretation is limited by the lack of HbA1c and lipid-modifying medication data and by single-time sampling. These findings suggest that PCSK9 alone may have limited utility for classifying dyslipidaemia in T2DM without adjustment for metabolic and therapeutic covariates. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.