ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Exploring barriers and facilitators of providing maternal healthcare in Africa: systematic review protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMaternal health remains a critically neglected issue in low-resource countries and represents a significant public health concern. Maternal mortality in these regions is ten times higher than in high-income countries. Sub-Saharan Africa bears the highest maternal mortality ratio globally. The persistently high maternal mortality rate is attributed to the myriad professional, social, and economic challenges healthcare providers face, which impede their ability to deliver optimal maternal healthcare. Given the central role of healthcare professionals in maternal health, understanding the barriers and facilitators they encounter is essential to improving maternal health outcomes. This systematic review aims to synthesise the existing literature on the challenges and enablers of providing maternal healthcare in Africa.
methodThe review will involve a comprehensive search using databases such as MEDLINE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and PubMed, accessed through the City St. George's University library. The search strategy will be refined with input from the school librarian to ensure thoroughness. Search terms will include Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms like "Barriers OR challenges," "Facilitators OR Enablers," "maternal health," and "Africa," alongside relevant keywords. Boolean operators "AND" and "OR" will expand the search scope, with inclusion criteria limited to English-language articles published between 2010 and 2025 with available abstracts, studies conducted in African countries, and qualitative articles addressing barriers and/or facilitators of maternal healthcare. The SPIDER framework will guide the research question, adhering to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, while STARLITE principles will report on the literature search process. The selected studies will be appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative studies.
resultData will be analysed thematically following the approach outlined by Thomas and Harden (2008), presenting findings as an interpretive summary.
conclusionThis review will enhance the existing evidence on the challenges and opportunities faced by maternal healthcare providers in delivering better services across Africa. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No formal ethical approval is necessary since this study does not involve collecting primary data. The findings will be shared via a peer-reviewed journal article and presented at conferences. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: (PROSPERO) CRD42025634335.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.