ArticleJournal of evidence-based medicine2025
Should the Workload of Combining Clinical Practice With Data Collection be Considered: A Survey of Physicians With Data Collection Experience.
Article in Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Should the Workload of Combining Clinical Practice With Data Collection be Considered: A Survey of Physicians With Data Collection Experience.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo survey the physician's attention to the workload of combining clinical practice with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) data collection.
backgroundWith the development of artificial intelligence technology in the medical field, the task of collecting diverse clinical data in TCM has increased. Based on the TCM's diagnostic and treatment principles, the collection of research data accompanying clinical practice is inevitable, which may have an impact on TCM clinical practice.
methodA previous research was conducted to collect diverse instant TCM diagnostic and treatment data, and physicians and research designers proposed many suggestions focusing on the workload of combining clinical practice with TCM data collection. In this study, A 54-item questionnaire was developed based on the suggestions. Forty-eight participants with data-collection experience participated in a questionnaire survey, and they needed to grade each item, which reflected their attention to the workload of combining clinical practice with TCM data collection.
resultsThe survey received 40 valid questionnaires, with 49 items scoring 4 or above. Three items in the content dimension (Q9, Q10, Q11) and two items in the spatial dimension (Q31, Q48) are scored lower. Additionally, 25 supplementary suggestions were collected during the study.
conclusionThe workload of combining clinical practice with TCM data collection needs to be considered. The items in this survey could be regarded as a basis for developing a tool to consider the relationship between clinical practice and data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.