ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Lymph node metastases in early gastric cancer: Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines can be used for endoscopic resection in the West.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indications and Curability Criteria for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients: Current Standards and Future Perspectives.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Management of Gastric Precancerous Lesions and Early Cancer: Practice-Oriented Answers to Clinical Questions.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: The eCura system has been shown to accurately delineate early gastric cancers with negligible risk of lymph node metastases, which, therefore, would be considered endoscopically cured. However, this classification was based predominantly on data from high-incidence Eastern countries. We sought to assess whether these criteria can be safely applied in a Western population. Patients and methods: Data were retrospectively recorded for patients who underwent gastrectomy in four Australian tertiary centee over two decades. Demographic data, lesion characteristics (size, differentiation, invasion depth, lymphovascular invasion, and ulceration) as well as number of lymph node metastases was recorded. Patients given neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Results: A total of 1,465 gastrectomy specimens were reviewed, including in 558 patients who underwent resection of gastric adenocarcinoma without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (mean age 67.9, 64.2% male). Of these, 101 (18.1%, confidence interval [CI] 15.4%-21.9%) had T1 disease (T1a = 30, T1b = 71). Of the lesions, 11.5% (n = 64, CI 9.1%-14.4%) met the 2021 Japanese "absolute criteria" for endoscopic resection, with 7.8% of these (n = 5, CI 3.4%-17%) having positive lymph nodes at gastrectomy. Of them, 9.9% (n = 55, CI 7.6%-12.6%) would have been considered eCura A or B, with none of these having positive lymph nodes at gastrectomy. Conclusions: The eCura system for defining endoscopic curability could have been safely applied in this Western population. Even in Western countries, patients with early gastric cancer that meets Japanese guidelines for endoscopic resection should, where possible, undergo en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection. Lesions classified histologically as eCuraA or B should be considered endoscopically cured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.