ReviewGenes & diseases2026
High-dose vitamin C: A promising anti-tumor agent, insight from mechanisms, clinical research, and challenges.
Review in Genes & diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ascorbate-driven quinone redox cycling as a pro-oxidant anticancer strategy.Redox biology · 2026Review
- High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C in Critical Illness: A Translational Exposure-Response Framework for Biomarker-Guided Precision Therapy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ROS and Antioxidants: Prospective Therapeutic Options in Cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- The Redox Paradox of Natural Supplements in Cancer: A Narrative Review to Guide Clinical Practice.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Pro-Metastatic Roles of ROS.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin C, also known as ascorbic acid, has sparked controversy since it first emerged as a potential anti-cancer agent. However, an increasing number of preclinical studies have demonstrated that high-dose vitamin C exhibits selective anti-tumor effects, including "pro-oxidative cytotoxicity", "anti-cancer epigenetic regulation", and "immune modulation". Consequently, vitamin C has reemerged as a promising anti-cancer therapy in the form of high-dose administration. Advancements in pharmacokinetic research have facilitated the development of clinical trials. Early clinical studies across various cancer types have confirmed the safety of high-dose vitamin C administered via intravenous injection. Moreover, its use as an adjuvant therapy in combination with standard treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, has shown promising therapeutic potential. However, there remains a lack of consensus regarding optimal dosage, administration methods, tumor specificity, and patient selection. These factors have contributed to the inconsistent outcomes observed in phase II clinical trials and have hindered the widespread conduct of phase III trials. Without robust clinical evidence, high-dose vitamin C, despite being a non-toxic and promising anti-cancer agent, risks being "shelved" once again. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the anti-tumor mechanisms of high-dose vitamin C and a detailed analysis of preclinical and clinical studies investigating its role as an anti-cancer agent. Additionally, we explore emerging trends in high-dose vitamin C therapy for cancer treatment and offer recommendations for future research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.