SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Efficacy and safety of esketamine for pain control after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of esketamine in reducing postpartum pain and depression in patients undergoing cesarean delivery (CD). Methods: Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched from the inception of each database up to September 2025 to select relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of esketamine for pain control in patients undergoing CD were selected. The outcomes included scores of postpartum pain, the incidence of depression after surgery, scores on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and the incidence of adverse events before and after surgery. The stability of the results and potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Results: This meta-analysis included ten studies comprising 15 intervention groups. A total of 2218 individuals undergoing CD were involved. Compared with the control group, esketamine showed relatively favorable effects on controlling rest pain at 24 h (SMD = -0.42; 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.16; P < 0.00001; I Conclusion: As a therapy for postoperative analgesia, esketamine shows relatively favorable efficacy in pain control and is associated with a lower risk of postpartum depression. However, this result is unstable. Furthermore, esketamine may increase the risk of dizziness in pregnant women aged over 30 years. Since all the experiments in this study are conducted in China, there are certain regional limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.