ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025
RNA-seq-based elucidation of lactylation in breast cancer.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lactylation is the covalent modification of histones using lactate as a small molecule precursor, playing a role in epigenetic regulation. As a novel protein post-translational modification, it has demonstrated significant relevance in the field of cancer diagnosis and therapy. However, the interaction between lactylation and tumor cells in breast cancer has not been extensively investigated. Material and methods: We acquired breast cancer-related data from the GEO and TCGA databases. Lactylation-related genes were identified from the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We utilized Cox and LASSO regression to identify genes with significant prognostic value for constructing a prognostic model and assessing its predictive performance. This model was integrated with clinical parameters to create a nomogram. Finally, we conducted immune infiltration analysis, analyzed differences in biological functions, and assessed drug sensitivity. Results: We ultimately identified 3 lactylation-related genes significantly associated with prognosis. These genes were used to construct a prognostic model and calculate a risk score. Using the median score, patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. Notably, the low-risk group patients exhibited better prognosis and higher levels of immune infiltration. GO/KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that PGK1, the gene with the highest HR among these genes, is widely involved in immune, metabolic, and proliferative signaling pathways. Its high expression also correlates with increased sensitivity to anti-tumor drugs. Conclusions: The study demonstrated the potential of lactylation-based molecular clustering and prognostic profiling for predicting survival, immune status, and treatment response in breast cancer patients. Additionally, we envision the use of PGK1 as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.