ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Advancing rare disease therapeutics through digital twins: Opportunities in drug development and precision dosing.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Advanced AI Frameworks for Dual PPAR α/γ Agonist Discovery in Alzheimer's Disease.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Rare Diseases: Workflow-Integrated Precision Kidney Care.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Reimagining care of people living with rare diseases with artificial intelligence.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare disease(s) (RD/RDs) are typically characterized by (i) genetically driven chronic, and life-threatening disease progression, (ii) delayed diagnoses, (iii) limited treatment options, and (iv) substantial economic burdens due to direct and indirect medical costs. Challenges in RD research include limited patient populations, sparse disease data, poorly understood pathophysiology and reduced trial funding for new exploratory therapies. In recent years, digital twin(s) (DT/DTs) are increasingly used for patient care, disease management, and resource optimization. They serve as virtual replicas of individual patients that enable simulation, prediction, and optimization of outcomes through real-time data integration and can facilitate advancements in treatment outcome and prediction of disease progression leveraging model-based personalized predictions. This review included 16 studies and focuses on how DTs are currently used in RD research by analyzing the underlying modeling techniques, including physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling, quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling, physiome modeling, and combined approaches. It identifies the limitations of these models that currently prevent them from qualifying as true DTs. Furthermore, this review discusses the potential advantages of DTs in drug development for new treatment strategies, disease progression modeling, and clinical decision support for RD research. Finally, it outlines the current state of DT implementation in the RD field, revealing that DT implementation remains in an early stage of development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.