Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404110›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Advancing rare disease therapeutics through digital twins: Opportunities in drug development and precision dosing.

Charlotte Maria Ursula Dette, Veronika Alberg, Simeon Rüdesheim, Dominik Selzer, Fatima Zahra Marok, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Laura Maria Fuhr, Søren Brunak, Ewan R Pearson, Tobias Zahn and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Charlotte Maria Ursula DetteClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.
Veronika AlbergClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.
Simeon RüdesheimClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.
Dominik SelzerClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.
Fatima Zahra MarokClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.
Nicola Luigi BragazziClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.
Laura Maria FuhrClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.
Søren BrunakNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ewan R PearsonDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Reproductive Biology, Ninewells Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Tobias ZahnCrowd Pharma GmbH, Pforzheim 75179, Germany.
Dimitra KiritsiDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany.
Matthias SchwabDr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart 70376, Germany.
Thorsten LehrClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare disease(s) (RD/RDs) are typically characterized by (i) genetically driven chronic, and life-threatening disease progression, (ii) delayed diagnoses, (iii) limited treatment options, and (iv) substantial economic burdens due to direct and indirect medical costs. Challenges in RD research include limited patient populations, sparse disease data, poorly understood pathophysiology and reduced trial funding for new exploratory therapies. In recent years, digital twin(s) (DT/DTs) are increasingly used for patient care, disease management, and resource optimization. They serve as virtual replicas of individual patients that enable simulation, prediction, and optimization of outcomes through real-time data integration and can facilitate advancements in treatment outcome and prediction of disease progression leveraging model-based personalized predictions. This review included 16 studies and focuses on how DTs are currently used in RD research by analyzing the underlying modeling techniques, including physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling, quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling, physiome modeling, and combined approaches. It identifies the limitations of these models that currently prevent them from qualifying as true DTs. Furthermore, this review discusses the potential advantages of DTs in drug development for new treatment strategies, disease progression modeling, and clinical decision support for RD research. Finally, it outlines the current state of DT implementation in the RD field, revealing that DT implementation remains in an early stage of development.

Indexed as

Digital twinsOrphan diseasesOrphan drug developmentRare diseasesRecessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

Identifiers

PMID41404110
PMCPMC12703978

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.