ReviewCureus2025
Sepsis-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction and Its Prognostic Implications for Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SIMD) is increasingly recognized as a critical determinant of morbidity in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, yet its direct impact on mortality remains uncertain. This systematic review synthesized evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies investigating the association between SIMD and outcomes in septic patients. Echocardiographic and biomarker-based assessments consistently demonstrated that SIMD is a frequent and often reversible complication of sepsis, associated with greater disease severity and impaired hemodynamics. Pharmacological interventions such as levosimendan and Xinmailong infusion were found to improve surrogate measures of cardiac function, yet none conferred a significant survival benefit at 28 days. While advanced imaging modalities like speckle-tracking echocardiography enhanced diagnostic sensitivity, heterogeneity in study design, patient populations, and outcome definitions limited the strength of pooled conclusions. Overall, SIMD appears to be a clinically relevant marker of illness severity, but current evidence does not establish it as an independent predictor of mortality. Larger multicenter trials with standardized diagnostic frameworks and long-term follow-up are required to clarify its prognostic role and to determine whether targeted therapies can alter patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.