Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404235›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Incidence, Detection, and Management of Urological Injuries in Obstetric and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Five-Year Observational Study.

Vinay S Kundargi, Kiran K Negi, Siddanagouda B Patil, Santosh Patil, Dhruva H M, Gulshan Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vinay S KundargiUrology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Kiran K NegiUrology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Siddanagouda B PatilUrology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Santosh PatilUrology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Dhruva H MUrology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Gulshan KumarUrology, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUrological injuries are rare but significant complications of obstetric and gynecologic procedures, associated with morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and medicolegal implications. Bladder injuries are typically identified intraoperatively, while ureteric injuries are often delayed presentation. Early recognition and prompt management are critical to reduce complications. The study aimed to evaluate the incidence, type, timing of detection, management, and outcomes of urological injuries in patients undergoing obstetric and gynecologic surgeries. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective and prospective study included 15,697 procedures (6150 gynecologic surgeries, 9547 lower segment cesarean sections) performed from January 2020 to December 2024 at a tertiary care center. Intraoperative and postoperative urological injuries were recorded and classified as early (≤7 days) or late (>7 days). Management strategies included primary repair, endoscopic procedures, stenting, or ureteric reconstruction. Descriptive statistics summarized patient demographics, injury rates, and outcomes. Comparisons were performed using chi-square and t-tests, with p <0.05 considered significant.

resultsUrological injuries occurred in 43 (0.27%) procedures; bladder injuries in 34 (0.21%), ureteric injuries in 7 (0.04%), and combined injuries in 2 (0.01%). Bladder injuries were slightly more frequent during obstetric procedures 22 (0.23%) compared to gynecologic procedures 12 (0.19%), whereas ureteric injuries occurred only in gynecologic surgeries 7 (0.11%). Most injuries 33 (76.7%) were detected intraoperatively. Intraoperative bladder injuries were repaired primarily with suprapubic cystostomy, and ureteric injuries underwent uretero-neocystostomy or ureteroureterostomy. Early recognition facilitated effective management and favorable outcomes, with mean hospital stay ranging from four to 12 days depending on injury type and timing.

conclusionUrological injuries are uncommon but clinically important. Early intraoperative detection and tailored surgical management ensure optimal outcomes. Preventive strategies, including meticulous surgical technique and careful intraoperative assessment, are essential to minimize morbidity.

Indexed as

bladder injurygynecologic surgeryobstetric surgeryureteric injuryurological injuries

Identifiers

PMID41404235
PMCPMC12703110

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.