ArticleDialogues in health2025
Exploring the interpretive processes of symptom perception among diabetes patients in eastern region of Ghana.
Article in Dialogues in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Illness perception has emerged as a critical factor influencing self-care behaviours, psychological distress, and health outcomes among patients with diabetes. However, there is limited understanding of how individuals with diabetes in Ghana cognitively interpret their symptoms. Therefore, this study explored the interpretive processes of symptom perception among diabetes patients in the Eastern Region (Koforidua) of Ghana. Methods: Using a qualitative design grounded in interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 purposively selected participants attending the diabetes clinic at Koforidua Regional Hospital. The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach was used to analyze the qualitative data. Results: Two main themes with their subthemes were identified: symptoms identification (increased urination and sweet-smelling urine, persistent thirst and hunger, noticeable weight loss; routine check-up/blood pressure; blisters, foot sore, non-healing wounds), and patients' perception (perception of diabetes as "disease of the rich"; belief in spiritual or supernatural causation; diabetes as a life-threatening and unpredictable condition). Symptom interpretation was shaped not only by personal experiences but also by sociocultural beliefs and community narratives. These interpretations highlight how cultural frameworks influence illness representation and health-seeking behaviours, consistent with the Common-Sense Model of illness perception. Conclusion: The study concludes that patients do not interpret symptoms in isolation but integrate them into broader belief systems, which significantly shape their responses to illness. To improve diabetes outcomes, public health interventions should prioritize culturally sensitive education that addresses misconceptions, enhances symptom recognition, and strengthens health literacy at the community level. Such strategies can empower patients to seek timely care, reduce late diagnosis, and improve self-management, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.