Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404474›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Investigating the impairment-performance relationship during competition in elite blind and partially sighted football.

Harrison K Leivers, Peter M Allen, Matthew A Timmis, Oliver R Runswick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harrison K LeiversCambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences (CCSES), Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter M AllenVision and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Matthew A TimmisCambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences (CCSES), Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Oliver R RunswickDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Classification systems aim to minimise the impact of impairment on competition outcome. To measure the effectiveness of a classification system, the relationship between impairment and performance must be investigated. There are two forms of football for athletes with vision impairment (VI): blind football and partially sighted football. Athletes are allocated to either one based on VI severity. Research is yet to assess the impact of impairment on performance in competition; therefore, this study aimed to measure the impairment-performance relationship in male blind, partially sighted and women's blind football. Methods: Notational data consisting of several technical performance measures were assessed (including, but not limited to, possession, passing, shots, and goals) and combined with visual function data from elite blind and partially sighted footballers. Correlations of notational match data and visual acuity (VA) were measured for male blind and partially sighted footballers (study one) and women's blind footballers (study two). Results: In study 1: the team-level analysis revealed a weak but statistically significant correlation between win ratio and VA for male blind football ( Discussion: These results evidence a different impairment-performance relationship for each version of the sport, and that the current classification system may not optimise fairness across each form of football.

Indexed as

classificationfootballparalympicpara sportvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID41404474
PMCPMC12703970

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.