Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405669›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026

Prognostic and clinicopathological implications of mismatch-repair deficiency and MLH1 promoter methylation status in endometrial carcinoma.

Mayuko Goda, Gou Yamamoto, Katsuya Iuchi, Koji Horie, Kiwamu Akagi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mayuko GodaDepartment of Gynecology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780, Oaza-Komuro, Ina-Machi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan. m_beeta16@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-8958
Gou YamamotoDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Cener, 780 Komuro, Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4709-7340
Katsuya IuchiDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Cener, 780 Komuro, Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0625-6018
Koji HorieDepartment of Gynecology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780, Oaza-Komuro, Ina-Machi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-4308
Kiwamu AkagiDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Cener, 780 Komuro, Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-9187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe prevalence of MSI-H and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MLH1-PHM) as well as Lynch syndrome in Japanese patients with endometrial cancer (EC) has not been fully revealed. There is also a recent report that the prognosis of MLH1-PHM is worse than MLH1 non-PHM in EC; however, no large-scale studies have been conducted in Japan. We investigated the prevalence of MSI-H, MLH1-PHM and Lynch syndrome in EC cases and characteristic and prognosis of them.

methodsThe 677 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with EC at the Saitama Cancer Center Hospital between 2013 and 2023 were investigated in this study. The MSI and abnormal DNA methylation of the MLH1 promoter were tested in all cases. Patients with MSI-H EC or a family history provided informed consent and examined germline testing for Lynch syndrome.

resultsAmong the 677 ECs, 170 (25.1%) were MSI-high (MSI-H), and 105 were involved MLH1 hypermethylation. Two of 13 Lynch syndrome cases had MLH1-PHM in ECs. The MSI-H group had more G3 histology, but had a favorable prognosis with 5-year PFS and OS compared with the MSS group. The group with MLH1-PHM have more patients with G1/2 histology and more advanced disease. There was no difference in prognosis between MLH1-PHM and non-PHM groups.

conclusionThis study provides information on the prevalence of MSI-H and MLH1-PHM in EC in Japan. Besides, the prognostic of the MSI-H group is better than that of the MSS group, but no differences were found between the MLH1-PHM and MLH1 non-PHM groups.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA MethylationDNA Mismatch RepairEndometrial NeoplasmsMutL Protein Homolog 1AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticMLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1Endometrial cancerLynch syndromeMLH1 promoter methylationMSI-high

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.