Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41406165›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

STAC-Net: A hierarchical framework for modeling and predicting urban traffic flow with uncertainty quantification.

Zekai Yan, Bowen Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zekai YanSchool of Art and Science, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9529-7423
Bowen CaiCollege of Transportation, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid urbanization and growing traffic complexity, predicting urban traffic flow with high accuracy has become an essential challenge. Traditional methods struggle to model the uncertainty in traffic flow due to intricate spatiotemporal dependencies and external influencing factors such as weather and events. In this paper, we propose a novel approach based on STAC-Net for urban traffic flow uncertainty modeling and prediction. The proposed method introduces a framework that combines spatiotemporal graph convolution, Convolutional Gated Recurrent Units (ConvGRU), and hierarchical self-attention mechanisms to effectively capture the spatiotemporal dependencies and dynamic uncertainty in traffic data. The spatiotemporal graph convolution module models the spatiotemporal features of traffic flow, ConvGRU enhances the ability to learn long-term temporal dependencies, and the hierarchical self-attention mechanism optimizes multi-scale feature extraction, improving prediction accuracy and robustness. To address uncertainty quantification, we incorporate the Neural Processes (NP) module, which generates multiple prediction outcomes to quantify uncertainty and provide more reliable decision support. This multi-output approach allows the model to provide precise and reliable traffic flow predictions for traffic management departments. Experimental results show that, on the METR-LA, PeMS04, and PeMS08 datasets, our model outperforms baseline methods across all time horizons, achieving a 10.5% reduction in Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and a 12.3% improvement in Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). In conclusion, our method provides a reliable and efficient framework for urban traffic flow prediction, addressing uncertainty in real-world traffic scenarios.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalCitiesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSpatio-Temporal AnalysisUncertaintyUrbanization

Identifiers

PMID41406165
PMCPMC12711082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.