Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41406169›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Concentration-dependent effects of fermented spent coffee grounds and contrasting effects of earthworms on growth and phytochemicals in medicinal plant Glechoma longituba.

Bing-Nan Zhao, Zi-Yang Xie, Jia-Ning Liu, Xiao-Ran Chen, Xin-Xin Wang, Jia-Yi Li, Rui Zhang, Chao Si

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bing-Nan ZhaoSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Handan University, Handan, China.
Zi-Yang XieSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Handan University, Handan, China.
Jia-Ning LiuSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Handan University, Handan, China.
Xiao-Ran ChenSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Handan University, Handan, China.
Xin-Xin WangSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Handan University, Handan, China.
Jia-Yi LiSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Handan University, Handan, China.
Rui ZhangSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Handan University, Handan, China.
Chao SiSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Handan University, Handan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-834X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fermented spent coffee grounds (FSCG) serve as a valuable soil amendment to improve soil structure and fertility, while earthworms play a well-established role in enhancing soil processes and plant growth. However, their combined effects on bioactive compound accumulation in medicinal plants remain unclear. This study investigated the individual and interactive effects of FSCG (0%, 10%, and 20%, v/v) and earthworms (with and without Pheretima guillelmi) on the growth and phytochemical content of Glechoma longituba, a common medicinal herb, under greenhouse conditions. Results showed that 10% FSCG generally promoted plant growth, whereas 20% FSCG generally enhanced the accumulation of total flavonoids, chlorogenic acid, and soluble protein. Earthworms enhanced aboveground biomass and node number but significantly reduced chlorogenic acid content. These findings highlight the potential of FSCG as a sustainable soil amendment in medicinal plant cultivation and underscore the need to consider earthworm activity when optimizing both plant biomass and phytochemical quality.

Indexed as

AsteraceaeCoffeeOligochaetaPhytochemicalsPlants, MedicinalAnimalsBiomassChlorogenic AcidFermentationSoilChlorogenic AcidCoffeePhytochemicalsSoil

Identifiers

PMID41406169
PMCPMC12711013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.